[MIRROR] Use defines for spellbook categories #3111
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Use defines for spellbook categories (#82938) ## About The Pull Request Spellbook entries' categories now use defines ## Why It's Good For The Game Prettier Less of a chance for misspelling a category Renaming a category is easier (for localized downstreams especially less strain) * Use defines for spellbook categories --------- Co-authored-by: larentoun <31931237+larentoun@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mirrored on Nova: NovaSector/NovaSector#2235
Original PR: tgstation/tgstation#82938
About The Pull Request
Spellbook entries' categories now use defines
Why It's Good For The Game
Prettier
Less of a chance for misspelling a category
Renaming a category is easier (for localized downstreams especially less strain)