Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
docs: mention the ongoing work on shifting algorithm in the API notat…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…ion (#747)

* docs: mention the ongoing work on shifting algorithm in the API notation, when discussing flex models

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Höning <nicolas@seita.nl>

* Add hint about using storage-efficiency in buffer scheduling

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Höning <nicolas@seita.nl>

---------

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Höning <nicolas@seita.nl>
  • Loading branch information
nhoening committed Jul 3, 2023
1 parent af7f411 commit 9291830
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 1 deletion.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion documentation/api/notation.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -204,13 +204,14 @@ Here are the three types of flexibility models you can expect to be built-in:

2) For **shiftable processes**

.. todo:: A simple algorithm exists, needs integration into FlexMeasures and asset type clarified.
.. todo:: A simple and proven algorithm exists, but is awaiting proper integration into FlexMeasures, see `PR 729 <https://github.com/FlexMeasures/flexmeasures/pull/729>`_.

3) For **buffer devices** (e.g. thermal energy storage systems connected to heat pumps), use the same flexibility parameters described above for storage devices. Here are some tips to model a buffer with these parameters:

- Describe the thermal energy content in kWh or MWh.
- Set ``soc-minima`` to the accumulative usage forecast.
- Set ``roundtrip-efficiency`` to the square of the conversion efficiency. [#]_
- Set ``storage-efficiency`` to a value below 100% to model (heat) loss.

.. [#] Setting a roundtrip efficiency of higher than 1 is not supported. We plan to implement a separate field for :abbr:`COP (coefficient of performance)` values.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 9291830

Please sign in to comment.