-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-32794: Add back rules that were once shipped in RHCOS4 #11887
OCPBUGS-32794: Add back rules that were once shipped in RHCOS4 #11887
Conversation
🤖 A k8s content image for this PR is available at: Click here to see how to deploy itIf you alread have Compliance Operator deployed: Otherwise deploy the content and operator together by checking out ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator and: |
/test |
@rhmdnd: The
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test e2e-aws-rhcos4-stig |
STIG failures here should be getting addressed in #11790 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
df276b7
to
c242b67
Compare
Rebased to re-kick some testing farm tests |
/hold for test |
@yuumasato One question, is rule rhcos4-file-permissions-sudo dropped on purpose? Thanks.
|
These rules don't have a prodtype, and they were not added to RHCOS4's default.profile.
c242b67
to
e2f1116
Compare
@xiaojiey Nice catch, the rule should be there. |
@yuumasato: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Pre-merge verification pass with 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-04-23-032717 + ghcr.io/complianceascode/k8scontent:11887
|
/lgtm |
Code Climate has analyzed commit e2f1116 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 59.4% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
Description:
default.profile
rules that were once shipped in RHCOS4 Benchmark.prodtype
and were not added to RHCOS4'sdefault.profile
Rationale:
TailoredProfiles
.Review Hints: