Supported pairs query

[fbielejec]

Adding a missing query on the azero contract ( supported pairs )

[JanKuczma]

It's not a part of this PR but maybe it could be fixed here as it touches bridge_weth.ts file:

most/azero/scripts/bridge_weth.ts

Lines 14 to 20 in 9a35d3a

	function getTokenAddresses(addresses, tokenName): [string, string] {
	for (let [_, ethAddress, azeroAddress] of addresses.tokens) {
	if (tokenName == tokenName) {
	return [ethAddress, azeroAddress];
	}
	}
	}

function getTokenAddresses(addresses, tokenName): [string, string] {
  for (let [_tokenName, ethAddress, azeroAddress] of addresses.tokens) {
    if (tokenName == _tokenName) {
      return [ethAddress, azeroAddress];
    }
  }
}

most/azero/scripts/bridge_weth.ts

Line 28 in 9a35d3a

const weth_azero = getTokenAddresses(addresses, "weth")[1];

  const weth_azero = getTokenAddresses(addresses, "wETH")[1];

[fbielejec]

It's not a part of this PR but maybe it could be fixed here as it touches bridge_weth.ts file:

most/azero/scripts/bridge_weth.ts

Lines 14 to 20 in 9a35d3a

	function getTokenAddresses(addresses, tokenName): [string, string] {
	for (let [_, ethAddress, azeroAddress] of addresses.tokens) {
	if (tokenName == tokenName) {
	return [ethAddress, azeroAddress];
	}
	}
	}

function getTokenAddresses(addresses, tokenName): [string, string] {
  for (let [_tokenName, ethAddress, azeroAddress] of addresses.tokens) {
    if (tokenName == _tokenName) {
      return [ethAddress, azeroAddress];
    }
  }
}

most/azero/scripts/bridge_weth.ts

Line 28 in 9a35d3a

const weth_azero = getTokenAddresses(addresses, "weth")[1];

  const weth_azero = getTokenAddresses(addresses, "wETH")[1];

Pushed in 1302d73

[fbielejec]

Can we merge this @krzysztofziobro @obrok ? Best before mainnet release I suppose?

[krzysztofziobro]

I would merge it, but I think it would be nice to add here also getters for fee constants + I would remove the upgrade script (upgrades need to be manual performed by the contract owner anyway).

[fbielejec]

I would merge it, but I think it would be nice to add here also getters for fee constants + I would remove the upgrade script (upgrades need to be manual performed by the contract owner anyway).

Done, please double check me if we're not missing sth