Skip to content

BiDAlab/SVC2021_EvalDB

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

11 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

SVC2021_EvalDB

INSTRUCTIONS FOR DOWNLOADING SVC2021_EvalDB

  1. Download your corresponding license agreement:

    [link] Permanent researchers working at research or academic institutions, and selected companies generating research outcomes.

    Once the corresponding license agreement is signed, send the scanned copy to atvs@uam.es according to the instructions given in point 2.

  2. Send an email to atvs@uam.es, as follows:

    Subject: [DATABASE download: SVC2021_EvalDB]

    Body: Your name, e-mail, telephone number, organization, postal mail, purpose for which you will use the database, time and date at which you sent the email with the signed license agreement.

  3. Once the email copy of the license agreement has been received at ATVS, you will receive an email with a username, a password, and a time slot to download the database.

  4. Download the database, for which you will need to provide the authentication information given in step 4. After you finish the download, please notify by email to atvs@uam.es that you have successfully completed the transaction.

  5. For more information, please contact: atvs@uam.es

DESCRIPTION OF SVC2021_EvalDB

The SVC2021_EvalDB database is a novel database specifically acquired for SVC 2021 and also used in SVC-OnGoing Competition. Two acquisition scenarios are considered: office and mobile scenarios.

  • Office scenario: on-line signatures from 75 total subjects were acquired using a Wacom STU-530 device with the stylus as writing input. Regarding the acquisition protocol, the device was placed on a desktop and subjects were able to rotate it in order to feel comfortable with the writing position. It is important to highlight that the subjects considered in the acquisition of SVC2021_EvalDB are different compared to the ones considered in the DeepSignDB database. Signatures were collected in two separated sessions with a time gap between them of at least 1 week. For each subject, there are 8 total genuine signatures (4 signatures/session) and 16 skilled forgeries (8 signatures/type) performed by four different subjects in two different sessions. Regarding the skilled forgeries, both static and dynamic forgeries were considered in the first and second acquisition sessions, respectively. Information related to X and Y spatial coordinates, pressure, and timestamp is recorded for the Wacom device. In addition, pen-up trajectories are also available.

  • Mobile scenario: on-line signatures from 119 total subjects were acquired using the same acquisition framework considered in MobileTouchDB. Regarding the acquisition protocol, we implemented an Android App and uploaded it to the Play Store in order to study an unsupervised mobile scenario. This way all subjects could download the App and use it on their own devices without any kind of supervision, simulating a practical scenario in which subjects can generate touchscreen on-line signatures in any possible scenario, e.g., standing, sitting, walking, indoors, outdoors, etc. As a result, 94 different smartphone models from 16 different brands were collected during the acquisition. Regarding the acquisition protocol, between four and six separated sessions in different days were considered with a total time gap between the first and last session of at least 3 weeks. For each subject, there are at least 8 total genuine signatures (2 signatures/session) and 16 skilled forgeries (8 signatures/type) performed by four different subjects. Regarding the skilled forgeries, both static and dynamic forgeries were considered, similar to the office scenario. Information related to X and Y spatial coordinates, and timestamp is recorded for all devices. Pen-up information is not available in this case.

REFERENCES

For further information on the database and on different applications where it has been used, we refer the reader to (all these articles are publicly available in the publications section of the BiDA group webpage.)

  • R. Tolosana, R. Vera-Rodriguez, C. Gonzalez-Garcia, et al., “SVC-onGoing: Signature Verification Competition”, Pattern Recognition, 2022.

  • R. Tolosana, R. Vera-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez, and J. Ortega-Garcia, et al., “ICDAR 2021 Competition on On-Line Signature Verification”, in Proc. International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, ICDAR, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2021.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published