pcef issue tracking repo
Per the requirements list:
Must have
- Ability to save and come back to application, review and submit
- Ok
- Skip pattern
- Ok
- Select one or more application types (mini, small, planning, large)
- Ok
- Ability to download application into fillable form
- Not doable. Users can download any of the three applications. These will need to be pre-formed pdfs. There will be no upload option once the forms are submitted.
- Icon with hover text explainers
- Ok
- Report download in csv and pdf
- Ok
Would be nice to have
- Multiple users on same application
- This isn’t doable in the time allowed. Frankly it’s not doable with the current infrastructure that this application will live on. It would require a purchase of cloud infrastructure and much R&D. We’re essentially talking about a private, custom, google docs experience. Resources simply don’t allow.
- Pull from different inputs to calculate ouput
- Ok
- Ability to read and make notes
- Read—Ok. Notes -- Ok if only for staff. Not doable for non-city staff… potentially doable if it’s a group of pre-identified people that is unlikely to change much
- Look and feel
- Vague but ok
All below is phase two:
Future scoring interface
- Staff control of assigning grants for review to multiple scorers
- Ok but also needs thought into identity access management (IAM). This is a decision point considering you have non-pdx reviewers
- Scorer access only to those applications they are assigned
- ok but see above
- Place for scorers to put scores
- ok but see above
- Ability to read and make notes
- ok but see above
- Scores only visible to staff
- ok
- Report generation pulling from defined fields in scoring interface and application interface
- ok