generated from jackyzha0/quartz
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
20 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: Technical Debt | ||
tags: | ||
- architecture | ||
- programming | ||
- management | ||
--- | ||
Technical debt has less to do with the code itself and more about the choices and compromises that emerge from the challenges within software development.[^notreal] | ||
|
||
In the realm of software development, the inception of a project is often marked by a paradoxical certainty: we know the least about the project at its beginning. This is an inherent trait, not a flaw, of the developmental process.[^notreal] | ||
|
||
The concept of refactoring sprints, while seemingly a solution, is often misguided. The root problem often lies not in the code itself, but in the processes that built that code. In cases of what might be termed “corporate technical debt,” a continuous, proactive approach to managing technical debt is more effective than sporadic refactoring sprints.[^notreal] | ||
|
||
[^notreal]: [Technical Debt is not real – Foxhound Systems](https://www.foxhound.systems/blog/technical-debt-is-not-real/?utm_source=tldrnewsletter) |