Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bittree sept 2023 #3547

Closed
wants to merge 63 commits into from

Conversation

akashdhruv
Copy link
Contributor

@akashdhruv akashdhruv commented Sep 15, 2023

Summary

Additional background

Checklist

The proposed changes:

  • fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
  • add new capabilities to AMReX
  • changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
  • are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users
  • include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate

@akashdhruv akashdhruv mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2023
5 tasks
@akashdhruv
Copy link
Contributor Author

Continued from #2893

@akashdhruv
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this for now. I will create new PR which will consolidate commit history

@akashdhruv akashdhruv closed this Sep 16, 2023
WeiqunZhang added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2023
…mode (#3555)

## Summary

This PR introduces dependency on [Bittree
library](https://github.com/Flash-X/Bittree) to improve regridding
performance in octree mode.

## Additional background

Testing and development of this feature is done in sync with Flash-X and
is recorded in this [reproducibility
capsule](https://github.com/Lab-Notebooks/AMReX-Bittree-Performance).
This PR is primarily created to consolidate development work and avoid
creating multiple branches. At present using AMReX+Bittree improves
regridding performance [by a factor of
2](https://github.com/Lab-Notebooks/AMReX-Bittree-Performance/blob/14faa2212c4e5dba7fd99a6526c6937414f9c109/analysis/Performance.ipynb)
at > 20000 ranks. We hope to improve performance further using a
bittree-based distribution mapping and therefore adding a new function
`AmrMesh::MakeDistributionMap` as a place-holder.

Continuation of #2893 and #3547

## Checklist

The proposed changes:
- [ ] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
- [x] add new capabilities to AMReX
- [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
- [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX
users
- [ ] include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate

---------

Co-authored-by: Weiqun Zhang <WeiqunZhang@lbl.gov>
Co-authored-by: Tom Klosterman <https://github.com/tklos96>
guj pushed a commit to guj/amrex that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
…mode (AMReX-Codes#3555)

## Summary

This PR introduces dependency on [Bittree
library](https://github.com/Flash-X/Bittree) to improve regridding
performance in octree mode.

## Additional background

Testing and development of this feature is done in sync with Flash-X and
is recorded in this [reproducibility
capsule](https://github.com/Lab-Notebooks/AMReX-Bittree-Performance).
This PR is primarily created to consolidate development work and avoid
creating multiple branches. At present using AMReX+Bittree improves
regridding performance [by a factor of
2](https://github.com/Lab-Notebooks/AMReX-Bittree-Performance/blob/14faa2212c4e5dba7fd99a6526c6937414f9c109/analysis/Performance.ipynb)
at > 20000 ranks. We hope to improve performance further using a
bittree-based distribution mapping and therefore adding a new function
`AmrMesh::MakeDistributionMap` as a place-holder.

Continuation of AMReX-Codes#2893 and AMReX-Codes#3547

## Checklist

The proposed changes:
- [ ] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
- [x] add new capabilities to AMReX
- [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
- [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX
users
- [ ] include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate

---------

Co-authored-by: Weiqun Zhang <WeiqunZhang@lbl.gov>
Co-authored-by: Tom Klosterman <https://github.com/tklos96>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants