Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Tangelo and Tangelo examples to the repository list #101

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ValentinS4t1qbit
Copy link

@ValentinS4t1qbit ValentinS4t1qbit commented Dec 12, 2023

Howdy !

Added Tangelo and Tangelo-Examples to the README under quantum algorithms.

I wonder if Tangelo qualifies for other categories too. Although Tangelo is a collection of building blocks and algorithms for the simulation of quantum chemistry workflows on quantum computers, some of its contents are not necessarily related to chemistry and can be used as simple imports.

  • It supports users in designing and carrying hardware experiments (connections to QPUs, manipulation of Histograms, reduction of resources...)
  • It offers functions allowing to connect various quantum projects together (Qulacs, Qiskit, Cirq, Q#, Pennylane, ...) and convenient high-level abstractions to several simulators (including an original symbolic simulator in sympy).

Could it qualify as full-stack as well ? Some users have been relying on it for non-chemistry applications.

@dlyongemallo
Copy link
Collaborator

What do you think is the best category? We try not to add the same package to multiple categories if there's a best fit, as otherwise the list would become messy and confusing as there are many packages which could arguably belong to multiple categories.

@ValentinS4t1qbit
Copy link
Author

I think the best category is full stack, since we provide an algorithm library, our own simulators, and other tools as well to explore circuits or submit them to various hardware. I have reflected this in the change, and are no longer listed under quantum-algorithms :)

@dlyongemallo
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you combine the entries into one line (see the example of gdsfactory)? Thanks.

@ValentinS4t1qbit
Copy link
Author

@dlyongemallo Should be good now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants