Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add callbacks on experiment finish #2822

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

mgrewe
Copy link

@mgrewe mgrewe commented Oct 17, 2022

Hi,

this is related to this discussion. The PR basically creates functionality to register callbacks that are executed once the experiment has finished.

Thanks,
Martin

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2022

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3e83367

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@bjoluc
Copy link
Member

bjoluc commented Oct 19, 2022

Thanks for the PR @mgrewe. To me, this solution looks like a workaround for very specific situations. Maybe adding an optional on_experiment_finish callback to extensions would be a better alternative? @jodeleeuw Interested in your thoughts about this.

@jodeleeuw
Copy link
Member

I agree that this is a specific situation.

Maybe adding an optional on_experiment_finish callback to extensions would be a better alternative?

I think @mgrewe was proposing such a callback in #2809, and I'm open to that idea.

Another option that doesn't require modification would be to simply expose a function from the extension that can be called for cleanup. (There are several functions like this in the webgazer extension). Then this method can be called in the regular event handler for the experiment finishing. I recognize that this isn't as clean of an option if the cleanup is mandatory -- then the extension should really handle it automatically.

@mgrewe
Copy link
Author

mgrewe commented Oct 21, 2022

Thanks for the feedback. I see your points and also think that the proposed PR somewhat breaks with the design ideas behind the extension/plugin mechanism. I like the idea of @bjoluc to add a class member function on_experiment_finish that may be used for the desired purpose. Do you think adding this might be an option?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants