Custom boolean functions for supporting noise models

[obliviateandsurrender]

Context: We aim to have a custom boolean function that could serve as a building block for creating noise models.

Description of the Change:

1. Generalizes the existing BooleanFn to work with arbitrary args and kwargs.
2. Adds NoiseConditionals as a class that helps build BooleanFn required for creating noise models.
3. Adds methods like wire/op_eq/in to enhance the building experience for the above BooleanFn.

Benefits:

Possible Drawbacks:

Related GitHub Issues: [sc-63080]

[github-actions]

Hello. You may have forgotten to update the changelog!
Please edit doc/releases/changelog-dev.md with:

• A one-to-two sentence description of the change. You may include a small working example for new features.
• A link back to this PR.
• Your name (or GitHub username) in the contributors section.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.67%. Comparing base (b7b4b75) to head (e2e7a31).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5674      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.68%   99.67%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         415      417       +2     
  Lines       38898    38748     -150     
==========================================
- Hits        38774    38623     -151     
- Misses        124      125       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[trbromley]

Thanks @obliviateandsurrender! Would you mind linking the corresponding SC story?

[Jaybsoni]

Looks good to go 💯. A left a few comments, also would suggest adding some tests for wires_in and wires_eq comparing with operations (specifically with operations of multiple wires like CNOT or some template)

Good job!

[KetpuntoG]

Looks great, good job! Here are a few minor comments.
I've been also doing a lot of tricky testing and I see it's bulletproof 😎

[trbromley]

Thanks @obliviateandsurrender! Really excited for this feature and thank you for making it a reality. I've left comments primarily around the documentation.

[trbromley]

Thanks @obliviateandsurrender, approved! I'll look at the follow up PRs over the coming days.