Fixing critical unwatchable catastrophic grammatical mistake

[PoulDev]

Good Evening @elmarco @shish @Kissaki @usagi @ElieDeBrauwer,
I was reading your tutorials when, suddenly, I encountered a unacceptable grammatical mistake, but let's start from the beginning.

Your code follows the camelCase style for functions, which means that every new word start with a capital letter, except for the first one. Here's an example:

void addUser
(
    void
)
{
    return;
}

But there's a function, a function named cleanup, that got my attention.

I have an hypothesis: cleanup is wrong!

After a very heated argument with a friend ( not anymore ) of mine, he put a rock on the argument by saying the following words, and I quote:

"In the lexicon of language, we adhere to the nuanced intricacies of expression; hence, we utilize "clean up" rather than "cleanup" to convey the depth of our actions."

• Marcus Aurelius

Here's a graphical representation:

But WHY?

Why Marcus Aurelius said to use clean up and not cleanup?
There's a crucial rule in grammar: cleanup is written without any space ONLY if it's used as a noun or an adjective.

"Cleanup (one word) is a noun or an adjective. To wit: The cleanup after the rowdy festival took days to complete."
"Clean up (two words) is a verb. Also to wit: You’ll need a broom, dust pan, and mop to clean up the kitchen floor. "

• from inventingrealityeditingservice.typepad.com

---

here's some examples
This function cleans up memory
wait, I'm cleaning up my code

So, in code/01_instance_creation.cpp I suggest to change the function cleanup in cleanUp.

This being said, have a nice day sir.

Credits: Me & Marcus Aurelius

[loricso]

"I agree"
~ Marcus Aurelius

[Kissaki]

Good morning @PoulDev

First, to ensure future communication remains understandable, I want to point you to your opening of "Good Evening", where you upper-cased evening instead of using the correct English grammar of lower-casing the noun.

Given your extensive knowledge and care for grammar, your making this mistake is both surprising and inexcusable.

But more gravely, you seem to misattribute who created this tutorial and who can change it. I don't know what steps you took to use correct attribution and highlighting, but it seems to be shallow at best. Consequently, the whole suggestion has to be questioned. I would suggest you revoke it and first seek to ensure its thorough correctness.