Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add SiteExtension.proj to replace build-extension.ps1 #10168

Open
wants to merge 28 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jviau
Copy link
Contributor

@jviau jviau commented May 15, 2024

Issue describing the changes in this PR

resolves #issue_for_this_pr

Pull request checklist

IMPORTANT: Currently, changes must be backported to the in-proc branch to be included in Core Tools and non-Flex deployments.

  • Backporting to the in-proc branch is not required
    • Otherwise: Link to backporting PR -- TODO
  • My changes do not require documentation changes
    • Otherwise: Documentation issue linked to PR
  • My changes should not be added to the release notes for the next release
    • Otherwise: I've added my notes to release_notes.md
  • My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
    • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr
  • My changes do not require diagnostic events changes
    • Otherwise: I have added/updated all related diagnostic events and their documentation (Documentation issue linked to PR)
  • I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)

Additional information

This PR introduces a new project WebHost.Script.SiteExtension, which is a replacement for build-extension.ps1. This project can be used via dotnet CLI to restore, build, and publish all the artifacts needed for the Antares site extension.

Other Changes

  • Removes update-hostreferences.ps1, this is no longer used anywhere
  • Groups all worker versions into workers.props file. Left python out due to code owners, but ideally python will be moved there as well.
  • zip-after-publish is extracted into a set of re-usable targets ZipPublish.targets.
  • RuntimeIdentifiers added to WebHost.csproj. Having this set of identifiers listed improves the restore task (otherwise each time you want to use a different runtime, you have to re-restore).

@jviau jviau requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 20:01
os: windows

variables:
${{ if or( eq( variables['Build.Reason'], 'PullRequest' ), and( not( contains( variables['Build.SourceBranch'], 'release/inproc6/4.' ) ), not( contains( variables['Build.SourceBranch'], 'release/inproc8/4.' ) ), not( contains( variables['Build.SourceBranch'], 'release/4.' ) ), not( contains( variables['Build.SourceBranch'], 'release/ExtensionsMetadataGenerator/' ) ) ) ) }}:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shall we remove the "release/inproc6/4" and "release/inproc8/4" usage here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have updated that in a different PR: #10171

@@ -42,9 +42,7 @@
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.AspNetCore.TestHost" Version="8.0.1" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Azure.DocumentDB.Core" Version="2.11.2" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Azure.EventHubs" Version="2.1.0" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Azure.Functions.NodeJsWorker" Version="3.10.0" />
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tests are not using anything from these packages?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are now brought in through worker.props at the top.

<GetFileHash Files="@(_FilesToHash)" HashEncoding="base64">
<Output TaskParameter="Items" ItemName="_HashedFiles" />
</GetFileHash>
</Target>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we skipping this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See worker.props CleanDotnetWorkerFiles target

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants