Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.3.0: Use jaq instead of j9 #39

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 27, 2024
Merged

v0.3.0: Use jaq instead of j9 #39

merged 6 commits into from
May 27, 2024

Conversation

ynqa
Copy link
Owner

@ynqa ynqa commented Apr 21, 2024

No description provided.

@ynqa ynqa changed the base branch from main to v0.3.0/main May 26, 2024 14:16
@ynqa ynqa added the v0.3.0 label May 26, 2024
@ynqa ynqa changed the title v0.x.0: Use jaq instead of j9 v0.3.0: Use jaq instead of j9 May 26, 2024
@ynqa ynqa marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2024 13:18
@ynqa ynqa mentioned this pull request May 27, 2024
@ynqa ynqa merged commit cee2ca2 into v0.3.0/main May 27, 2024
7 checks passed
@ynqa ynqa deleted the v0.x.0/jaq branch May 27, 2024 14:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How about replacement jq with jaq?
1 participant