Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update iwe protoxep #1035

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update iwe protoxep #1035

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sonnyp
Copy link
Contributor

@sonnyp sonnyp commented Feb 3, 2021

I really like this proposal and have been wanting something similar for a while.

http port

Quoting Marvin W

  • ws://...:5443/ws makes no sense. Port 5443 is obviously a reference to
    HTTPS 443 port which is TLS encrypted, so you shouldn't make non-TLS
    connections to 5443. If any, use something like port 5080 or 5280.

http(s) path

Also quoting Marvin W

  • Same as Sam, I'd also opt to use a path that is specific to XMPP and
    not as generic as /ws - at least for the default port variant. Best
    would probably be to register and use a well-known URI, e.g.
    /.well-known/xmpp-websocket.

server vendors

I'm not happy with the wording, suggestions?

I really like this proposal and have been wanting something similar for a while.

# `/ws` -> `/.well-known/xmpp-websocket`

In deployments, `/ws` is too generic and the domain might already have something running there for :443.

# `5443` -> `5280`

Quoting Marvin W

> - ws://...:5443/ws makes no sense. Port 5443 is obviously a reference to
HTTPS 443 port which is TLS encrypted, so you shouldn't make non-TLS
connections to 5443. If any, use something like port 5080 or 5280.

# server vendors

I'm not happy with the wording, suggestions?
@sonnyp sonnyp changed the title Update xep-iwe.xml Update iwe protoxep Feb 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant