Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OIL] Use mustache templates to build Java SDK + Add Java SDK build step to actions #5595

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

danilo-delbusso
Copy link
Member

@danilo-delbusso danilo-delbusso commented Apr 26, 2024

Unfortunately, I couldn't come up with an easy way to keep the same order of types in Types.java. The issue here is that they were added as they were found, so there was no specified order.

A good way to check would probably be to compare class structures instead. I'm happy to assist if possible.

The SDK sources are present in the PR's artifacts so you don't have to build them yourself.

This PR also adds the JAR to the release files.

Note that I did keep the existing side-effect operations of updating enums, types, etc.. I found that they weren't that much of an hassle to keep but feel free to weigh in.

For result of a release with the changes here see https://github.com/danilo-delbusso/xen-api/releases/tag/v60.1.3

Signed-off-by: Danilo Del Busso <danilo.delbusso@cloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Del Busso <danilo.delbusso@cloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Del Busso <danilo.delbusso@cloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Del Busso <danilo.delbusso@cloud.com>
Also adds a better definition of the compare function for module Ty. The previous one was leaving duplicates in the set by relying on the underlying `Set.compare`.

Signed-off-by: Danilo Del Busso <danilo.delbusso@cloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Del Busso <danilo.delbusso@cloud.com>
Also update wording in `parseResult`

Signed-off-by: Danilo Del Busso <danilo.delbusso@cloud.com>
@danilo-delbusso
Copy link
Member Author

force push was a rebase on master to fix conflicts with #5610

I also added 36d9134 as part of the push

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants