Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove redundant if check in testGetAuthCookie #22828

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mokagio
Copy link
Contributor

@mokagio mokagio commented Mar 14, 2024

There was already an XCTAssertEqual for that value.Fixes #

To test:

Regression Notes

  1. Potential unintended areas of impact

  2. What I did to test those areas of impact (or what existing automated tests I relied on)

  3. What automated tests I added (or what prevented me from doing so)

PR submission checklist:

  • I have completed the Regression Notes.
  • I have considered adding unit tests for my changes.
  • I have considered adding accessibility improvements for my changes.
  • I have considered if this change warrants user-facing release notes and have added them to RELEASE-NOTES.txt if necessary.

Testing checklist:

  • WordPress.com sites and self-hosted Jetpack sites.
  • Portrait and landscape orientations.
  • Light and dark modes.
  • Fonts: Larger, smaller and bold text.
  • High contrast.
  • VoiceOver.
  • Languages with large words or with letters/accents not frequently used in English.
  • Right-to-left languages. (Even if translation isn’t complete, formatting should still respect the right-to-left layout)
  • iPhone and iPad.
  • Multi-tasking: Split view and Slide over. (iPad)

There was already an `XCTAssertEqual` for that value.
This will help us better identify test failures. Rather that the whole
if not running its successful branch, we'll get failures for each
`cookie` property that did not match expectation.
@dangermattic
Copy link
Collaborator

dangermattic commented Mar 14, 2024

1 Warning
⚠️ This PR is larger than 500 lines of changes. Please consider splitting it into smaller PRs for easier and faster reviews.
1 Message
📖 This PR is still a Draft: some checks will be skipped.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

This is to see whether Nimble's approach to waiting for async code
results in less timeouts than XCTest.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants