Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advanced container handling #1067

Open
mslacken opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1068
Open

Advanced container handling #1067

mslacken opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1068
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@mslacken
Copy link
Member

mslacken commented Feb 1, 2024

Summary

The interaction of wwctl with container registries is quite limited. Following things are missing:

  • signature check
  • cache cleanup
  • reimport from the same container source
  • regsitry information of the imported container
  • push of a container
@mslacken mslacken added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 1, 2024
@mslacken mslacken changed the title Advanced container handling RFE: Advanced container handling Feb 1, 2024
@mslacken mslacken linked a pull request Feb 1, 2024 that will close this issue
@griznog
Copy link
Contributor

griznog commented Feb 1, 2024

Could this be implemented as a pass-through to the container management package of choice? Say in /etc/warewulf/wareulf.conf there was

container runtime: '[apptainer|singularity|podman|docker|???]'

and the functions needed by warewulf were just templates for calls to the various tools? The community could then contribute templates for the container runtime of their choice and it'd be up to the admin to ensure the container runtime they want to use is installed/configured.

@anderbubble anderbubble added this to the v4.6.0 milestone Feb 17, 2024
@anderbubble anderbubble changed the title RFE: Advanced container handling Advanced container handling Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants