Feature: Implement support for LL-HLS #EXT-X-PRELOAD-HINT part loading #6356
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I started to clean up the fragment-preloader |
robwalch
approved these changes
May 10, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd be happy to mark this for milestone v1.6.0 if others using HLS.js for Low-Latency HLS would preview this branch and let us know what kind or results they get compared to latest. Branch preview URL: https://feature-preload-hint.hls-js-4zn.pages.dev/
I can see us using FragmentPreloader to tackle byte-range addressing (#5767 chunked-transfer interop) in the future. Thanks for laying the ground work!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR will...
Add support for EXT-X-PRELOAD-HINT via state machine fragment-preloader.
Why is this Pull Request needed?
Reduce some latency for low latency mode by making preemptive requests.
Are there any points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Resolves issues:
To resolve #3988
Checklist