docs: adding notes for developers on prod deploy, licensing, and minor corrections

[mattxwang]

I want to preface this by saying that I'm planning on rescoping #187 and adding a follow-up issue.

In this PR, I address parts of the original spirit of #187:

• documenting the prod CD pipeline
• updating relevant portions of the docs to be more correct
• adding a licensing/attribution section
• adds TOC

I want to move the discussion around Next.js, as well as the general design choices, to a project design document not unlike the one for Creative Lab's website. More in #202.

closes #187.

[mattxwang]

Eventually, I'd love to see us write something like this DESIGN_GUIDELINES for the Creative Labs website!

In the span of a minute or so, I'm going to make an executive decision and say that we should make a design guidelines doc. I'll rescope #187 and submit a follow-up issue; that means that this PR is technically ready to merge.

[evanzhong]

lgtm.

Quickly scanned through the MPL and curious why you think it's a good fit

[mattxwang]

Quickly scanned through the MPL and curious why you think it's a good fit

I didn't make the decision! Nikhil Kansal chose it when he made the repo about four years ago, and I'm extremely wary of relicensing code unless it's absolutely needed. Also, I think a more aggressive copyleft license is probably fine for our use-case, I can't imagine it's too restrictive given the general nature of our codebase (not much reusability).

That being said, open to discussion re: this point - this is a good time to change the license if any.

[evanzhong]

Quickly scanned through the MPL and curious why you think it's a good fit

I didn't make the decision! Nikhil Kansal chose it when he made the repo about four years ago, and I'm extremely wary of relicensing code unless it's absolutely needed. Also, I think a more aggressive copyleft license is probably fine for our use-case, I can't imagine it's too restrictive given the general nature of our codebase (not much reusability).

That being said, open to discussion re: this point - this is a good time to change the license if any.

Personally I think a more aggressive copyleft is appropriate; our branding is unique and out website reflects that. I hear you about not wanting to relicense code though.

[mattxwang]

Wrapped up our license convo offline; looks like we'll merge!