Update cran comments

I believe the revdep failure (rb3) is a false positive. It did not show up in the first run.

I also checked datplot locally (failed in the first run) and passed R CMD check cleanly, so I also think that is a false positive.

cran-comments.md

@@ -1,13 +1,10 @@
-## revdepcheck results
-
-We checked 301 reverse dependencies (299 from CRAN + 2 from Bioconductor), comparing R CMD check results across CRAN and dev versions of this package.
+This is a patch release in response to a 2023-06-28 email from Kurt Hornik about inputs to numeric_version() and package_version().
 
- * We saw 0 new problems
- * We failed to check 2 packages
+In this case, the problematic inputs came from implicit usage via `>` in some tests and these have been removed.
 
-Issues with CRAN packages are summarised below.
+## revdepcheck results
 
-### Failed to check
+We checked 319 reverse dependencies, comparing R CMD check results across CRAN and dev versions of this package.
 
-* OlinkAnalyze (NA)
-* Platypus     (NA)
+ * We saw 0 new problems
+ * We failed to check 0 packages