ridge function to preserve factor levels #118
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Terry,
Thank you for the survival package.
For consideration, I've updated the ridge function so that it maintains factor levels. This entailed using the model.matrix function on ridge covariates as compared to cbinding the covariates. Penalization is calculated as before.
The scripts and output below compare the difference when using the original vs updated ridge function.
originalRidgeOut.txt
originalRidgeScript.txt
updateRidgeOut.txt
updateRidgeScript.txt
Kind regards,
Jonathan Chipman