You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In 7.3 Analytic Pearson Residuals, Germain et al. is cited as a the recommender.
While this benchmark is very comprehensive, here rather sctransform is recommended "We further evaluated normalization methods by investigating their impact on the separability of the subpopulations. [...] In general, sctransform systematically outperformed other methods."
Lause et al., on the other hand, recommend the approximate analytic pearson residuals, also over sctransform.
The sc.pp.experimental.pearson_residuals function used in 7.3 Analytic Pearson Residuals also references Lause et al. in its documentation.
So wouldn't it be more Lause et al. that should be cited here?
I'd suggest to add a sentence about Germain et al.'s work where suitable and keep this reference.
Interested in what you think - I might be missing something here.
Could do a PR with this additional citation if you agree
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Question
Hey,
In 7.3 Analytic Pearson Residuals, Germain et al. is cited as a the recommender.
While this benchmark is very comprehensive, here rather sctransform is recommended "We further evaluated normalization methods by investigating their impact on the separability of the subpopulations. [...] In general, sctransform systematically outperformed other methods."
Lause et al., on the other hand, recommend the approximate analytic pearson residuals, also over sctransform.
The
sc.pp.experimental.pearson_residuals
function used in 7.3 Analytic Pearson Residuals also references Lause et al. in its documentation.So wouldn't it be more Lause et al. that should be cited here?
I'd suggest to add a sentence about Germain et al.'s work where suitable and keep this reference.
Interested in what you think - I might be missing something here.
Could do a PR with this additional citation if you agree
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: