Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: update emojis to match yat emojis #6288

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

SWvheerden
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

This updates the emoji_id emojis to match those used by yat.

Motivation and Context

This will allow users to create a yat from their emoji_id as they now share all characters.

How Has This Been Tested?

unit tests

Breaking Changes

  • [] None
  • Requires data directory on base node to be deleted
  • Requires hard fork
  • Other - Please specify

This causes the string emoji representation of tari addresses to be incompatible with previous versions.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 19, 2024

Test Results (CI)

    3 files    120 suites   37m 41s ⏱️
1 277 tests 1 277 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
3 823 runs  3 823 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 506ae42.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project added P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged labels Apr 19, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 19, 2024

Test Results (Integration tests)

33 tests   33 ✅  13m 56s ⏱️
11 suites   0 💤
 2 files     0 ❌

Results for commit 506ae42.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

AaronFeickert
AaronFeickert previously approved these changes Apr 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@AaronFeickert AaronFeickert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project removed the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Apr 19, 2024
@AaronFeickert
Copy link
Collaborator

This may give merge conflicts with #6287, so beware!

hansieodendaal
hansieodendaal previously approved these changes Apr 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hansieodendaal hansieodendaal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Comment on lines 80 to +82
pub const EMOJI: [char; DICT_SIZE] = [
'🌀', '🌂', '🌈', '🌊', '🌋', '🌍', '🌙', '🌝', '🌞', '🌟', '🌠', '🌰', '🌴', '🌵', '🌷', '🌸', '🌹', '🌻', '🌽',
'🍀', '🍁', '🍄', '🍅', '🍆', '🍇', '🍈', '🍉', '🍊', '🍋', '🍌', '🍍', '🍎', '🍐', '🍑', '🍒', '🍓', '🍔', '🍕',
'🍗', '🍚', '🍞', '🍟', '🍠', '🍣', '🍦', '🍩', '🍪', '🍫', '🍬', '🍭', '🍯', '🍰', '🍳', '🍴', '🍵', '🍶', '🍷',
'🍸', '🍹', '🍺', '🍼', '🎀', '🎁', '🎂', '🎃', '🎄', '🎈', '🎉', '🎒', '🎓', '🎠', '🎡', '🎢', '🎣', '🎤', '🎥',
'🦋', '📟', '🌈', '🌊', '🎯', '🐋', '🌙', '🤔', '🌕', '⭐', '🎋', '🌰', '🌴', '🌵', '🌲', '🌸', '🌹', '🌻', '🌽',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Maybe add a reference to the YAT list?

@AaronFeickert
Copy link
Collaborator

This will require corresponding updates to RFC-0152 and the Tari site to account for the new emoji alphabet (emojibet?).

@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project added the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Apr 22, 2024
@ghpbot-tari-project ghpbot-tari-project removed the P-reviews_required Process - Requires a review from a lead maintainer to be merged label Apr 22, 2024
@SWvheerden
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tari-project/rfcs#145

@SWvheerden SWvheerden merged commit cf579f5 into tari-project:development Apr 23, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@SWvheerden SWvheerden deleted the sw_update_emojies branch April 29, 2024 07:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P-acks_required Process - Requires more ACKs or utACKs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants