update for ssb-server@15 use ssb-* plugins directly, ssb-server/plugins/* no longer supported

[dominictarr]

we are about to remove ssb-server/plugins directory, so these lines need to change.
the goal here is to make ssb-server into just a distribution. It doesn't have any complex code anymore.

[mixmix]

thanks @dominictarr - I'm currently tying to get a stable major release out. As usual, that's taken a lot more time than expected - including problems with ssb-ws and ssb-invite, which I've had to lock at old versions for the time being.

Keen to have a look at this in the next pass. In particular, getting to remove the shrinkwrap could be super sweet because there is massive amounts of duplication of sodium-native binaries that I have been totally unable to prune.

[mixmix]

I think we'll really start to feel the shape of this when we separate the opinionated CLI from the requirable server

…

On Sat, 18 May 2019, 06:13 Christian Bundy, ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In server.js <#332 (comment)>: > @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ var electron = require('electron') console.log('STARTING SBOT') var createSbot = require('ssb-server') - .use(require('ssb-server/plugins/master')) - .use(require('ssb-server/plugins/logging')) - .use(require('ssb-server/plugins/unix-socket')) - .use(require('ssb-server/plugins/no-auth')) - .use(require('ssb-server/plugins/onion')) - .use(require('ssb-server/plugins/local')) + .use(require('ssb-master')) + .use(require('ssb-logging')) + .use(require('ssb-unix-socket')) + .use(require('ssb-no-auth')) + .use(require('ssb-onion')) + .use(require('ssb-local')) Oh, I was thinking that ssb-server *as a distro* should be including these by default, maybe I didn't understand correctly? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#332?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAUK3HRN2OZPAJSJMOSHTLDPV3YVPA5CNFSM4HMONG52YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOBY754EA#pullrequestreview-239066640>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAUK3HWQS63KUWVTAAGL4ODPV3YVPANCNFSM4HMONG5Q> .

[dominictarr]

I think the problem here is that ssb-server is intended to be a distribution, but really, patchbay has it's own distribution. you should skip depending on ssb-server, and depend on secret-stack and build up all the plugins that you choose, as distribution maintainer.

Also you should run the tests for that combination of plugins, before releases. TODO: ssbc/ssb-server#650

[christianbundy]

This is sort of weird but it works.

ssb-ahoy depends on ssb-server and the individual plugins used, so package.json includes both. I've run npm dedupe so these point to the same files, but it's still a slightly unconventional config to ensure that it doesn't break ssb-ahoy.

The biggest change here from my perspective is that it means Patchbay will start supporting deleted messages in the database. In Patchwork master we're currently deleting all messages from blocked feeds, which means that when I switch to Patchbay it crashes because it uses an old ssb-db that doesn't support deleted messages. To be super explicit, this PR won't make Patchbay start deleting anything, it just makes it so that it understands when other clients delete messages from the shared database.

[stale]

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

[arj03]

Seems as if this is in master now.

[christianbundy]

Cool!