Add group number support in Taxon queries

[grantfitzsimmons]

Fixes #4723

This has been tested between both Specify 6 and 7. Existing queries that previously were non-functional created in 6 work now as well!

The previous configuration expected <RankName> GroupNumber, but Specify 6 constructs the string ID for these query items as <RankName> groupNumber.

Checklist

• Self-review the PR after opening it to make sure the changes look good
  and self-explanatory (or properly documented)
• Add relevant issue to release milestone

Testing instructions

Note: To properly test some of these, you will need to use Specify 6 locally to configure such a query or you can import this query that was created in Specify 6:
GroupNumber 6 Query.json

• Run a query that had the field "Group Number" added at the Family level in Specify 6
  • Verify the output is consistent with Specify 6 and that all query functions work as expected
• Add "Group Number" to various ranks in the Taxon tree and ensure it can be searched on and results are displayed properly
• Verify that hiding and unhiding "Group Number" in the schema configuration make it appear as expected

[maxpatiiuk]

🎉

[maxpatiiuk]

FYI: from what Ben told me, the only reason we limit what fields are accessible in tree queries is because that's what sp6 did
that reason might be less good today compared to how it was in 2013.
@realVinayak interested in tackling this at some point?

[emenslin]

Testing instructions

Note: To properly test some of these, you will need to use Specify 6 locally to configure such a query or you can import this query that was created in Specify 6:
GroupNumber 6 Query.json

• Run a query that had the field "Group Number" added at the Family level in Specify 6
  • Verify the output is consistent with Specify 6 and that all query functions work as expected
• Add "Group Number" to various ranks in the Taxon tree and ensure it can be searched on and results are displayed properly
• Verify that hiding and unhiding "Group Number" in the schema configuration make it appear as expected

Looks good, group number can now be queried in 7

[combs-a]

Testing instructions

• Run a query that had the field "Group Number" added at the Family level in Specify 6
  • Verify the output is consistent with Specify 6 and that all query functions work as expected
• Add "Group Number" to various ranks in the Taxon tree and ensure it can be searched on and results are displayed properly
• Verify that hiding and unhiding "Group Number" in the schema configuration make it appear as expected

Everything looks to be working correctly, used it between a local specify 6 DB and used the query Grant posted for instructions on sdnhmherps as well.

Results in 6 and 7:

When hidden:

And the query I made for the local DB (worked on sdnhmherps as well):
GroupNumberTest.json

Good work!

[alesan99]

• Run a query that had the field "Group Number" added at the Family level in Specify 6
  • Verify the output is consistent with Specify 6 and that all query functions work as expected
• Add "Group Number" to various ranks in the Taxon tree and ensure it can be searched on and results are displayed properly
• Verify that hiding and unhiding "Group Number" in the schema configuration make it appear as expected

Query results are different between SP 6 and 7.

With one of the group number lines removed SP 7 matches.

And this is how it looks on v7 (without the GroupNumber lines)