Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 27, 2019. It is now read-only.

fbp meta types on conf files #927

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bdilly
Copy link
Contributor

@bdilly bdilly commented Oct 21, 2015

This is more like a WIP since it's leaking parsers
and I intent to re-write it following an approach
discussed with @ibriano yesterday.

Parsers would have a way to call back its users
to handle with unknown types (or metatypes).

So runner would handle node types declared on conf files
just like it would with ones declared on fbp files.

I'm pushing it here to see if anybody else would like
to comment on that before doing such change.

flow: support fbp meta types on conffiles

It support to declare them on conffiles like:

{
"name": "NodeName",
"options": {
...
},
"type": "fbp:FILE_NAME.fbp"
}

Support was added only on runner (no generator support yet).
It leaks parsers (and consequently node types).

Paths used to look for fbp files are passed by runner.

Signed-off-by: Bruno Dilly bruno.dilly@intel.com

It support to declare them on conffiles like:

{
   "name": "NodeName",
   "options": {
       ...
   },
   "type": "fbp:FILE_NAME.fbp"
}

Support was added only on runner (no generator support yet).
It leaks parsers (and consequently node types).

Paths used to look for fbp files are passed by runner.

Signed-off-by: Bruno Dilly <bruno.dilly@intel.com>
@barbieri
Copy link

Just don't abuse "type" and then an encoded string. JSON is structured, so add a new key with an object instructing the mets type and all

@cabelitos
Copy link
Contributor

Should we support composed as well?

@barbieri
Copy link

Composed is a meta, so we're good if we support them

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants