feature(ProTubeVR): add compatibility for auxiliary haptics

[leon0399]

Close #51

[github-actions]

Coverage after merging feature/protubevt-compat into develop

39.53%

[leon0399]

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

[CodiumAI-Agent]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Adding compatibility for auxiliary haptics in ProTubeVR.
• 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces compatibility for auxiliary haptics in ProTubeVR. It includes a proof-of-concept sketch that sets up Bluetooth communication, defines pin configurations, and handles incoming Bluetooth commands to trigger haptic feedback.
• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3
  The PR is moderately complex as it involves Bluetooth communication and haptic feedback handling. However, the code is well-structured and should be relatively straightforward to review for someone familiar with the ESP32 and Bluetooth communication.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No
  The PR does not seem to introduce any obvious security concerns. However, it's always a good idea to ensure that Bluetooth communications are secure and that the device can't be controlled by unauthorized devices.

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: It would be beneficial to handle potential errors and edge cases in the Bluetooth communication and haptic feedback handling. Additionally, consider refactoring the code to improve modularity and readability.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: examples/poc-protubevr-compat/poc-protubevr-compat.ino
    suggestion: Consider handling the case where the Bluetooth connection is not available or gets interrupted. This could be done by adding error handling code in the btCallback function. [important]
    relevant line: void btCallback(esp_spp_cb_event_t event, esp_spp_cb_param_t *param) {

  • relevant file: examples/poc-protubevr-compat/poc-protubevr-compat.ino
    suggestion: The generateSN function could potentially run indefinitely if no suitable serial number is found. Consider adding a limit to the number of iterations. [important]
    relevant line: const uint32_t generateSN(const uint32_t i) {

  • relevant file: examples/poc-protubevr-compat/poc-protubevr-compat.ino
    suggestion: The simpleMap function could be made more generic by also taking in_min and out_min parameters. This would allow it to handle ranges that don't start at 0. [medium]
    relevant line: constexpr inline _Tp simpleMap(_Tp x, _Tp in_max, _Tp out_max) {

  • relevant file: examples/poc-protubevr-compat/poc-protubevr-compat.ino
    suggestion: The loop function is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions. [medium]
    relevant line: void loop() {

How to use

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (develop@fbbf901). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop      #76   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   43.38%           
==========================================
  Files              ?       42           
  Lines              ?     1224           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?      531           
  Misses             ?      693           
  Partials           ?        0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	43.38% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.