Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Add skeleton of particle/data/mass_width_extended.fwf #488

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eduardo-rodrigues
Copy link
Member

@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues commented Apr 21, 2023

This is the new extended particle data file for the package, to be maintained by us.

It effectively amalgamates and organises for the better what we have been using from the good-old 2008 PDG file mass_width_2008.fwf (only released that one year!) to provide extended information, which required our own mass_width_2008_ext.fwf to implement various sorts of updates (particle PDG IDs changing over time, etc.) It was becoming slightly unmaintainable to continue this way, and certainly not optimal. This master file solves issues.

Closes #118.

@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues self-assigned this Apr 21, 2023
@eduardo-rodrigues eduardo-rodrigues changed the title Add skeleton of particle/data/mass_width_extended.fwf WIP: Add skeleton of particle/data/mass_width_extended.fwf Apr 21, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (d0efbb8) 95.89% compared to head (d85c09d) 95.89%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #488   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.89%   95.89%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines        1389     1389           
=======================================
  Hits         1332     1332           
  Misses         57       57           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@eduardo-rodrigues
Copy link
Member Author

FYI @henryiii, @tamasgal and @redeboer since you showed interest in these files in the past. Feel free to add colleagues you know will be interested as well. I'm obviously very happy to receive any feedback.

In case you wonder - many values are dummy (-1) because they get overriden (on purpose) with information from the yearly PDG data files. This is to ensure the actual CSV file used by Particle contains always the latest and greatest info. Let me know if anything in unclear.

@redeboer
Copy link
Contributor

FYI @henryiii, @tamasgal and @redeboer since you showed interest in these files in the past. Feel free to add colleagues you know will be interested as well.

@mmikhasenko

@tamasgal
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@8me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data files ⚙️ enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Put particle changes in 2008 file
4 participants