-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 811
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add PerformingGroup as an expected type for the property actor #3352
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
As discussed in schemaorg#3185 cast information can contain groups (comedy, musical, etc.) as well as individual people.
Seems to have missed https://schema.org/Play See also |
Seems like a misinterpretation (as I see it) of Play as that is the source CreativeWork which is being performed in a specific TheaterEvent or BroadcastEvent. So a specific actor is linked to the event not to the play. Usually the Play is a singular conceptual instance that is performed over time in many performances. |
I believe |
:rangeIncludes :Person ; | ||
rdfs:comment "An actor, e.g. in TV, radio, movie, video games etc., or in an event. Actors can be associated with individual items or with a series, episode, clip." . | ||
:rangeIncludes :Person, | ||
:PerformingGroup ; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about also adding :PerformanceRole here to make the JSON-LD usage example consistent with schema? (See data/examples.txt LL10845-10860)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Role is meant to be applicable to any property, not just actor, as per the post announcing Role in 2014
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I see! Sorry for missing that, and thanks for the explanation!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries :)
This pull request is being nudged due to inactivity. |
Where are we with this one?
…On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 17:13, Gordon Mackenzie ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In data/schema.ttl
<#3352 (comment)>:
> @@ -9570,8 +9570,9 @@ we define a supporting type, [[SpeakableSpecification]] which is defined to be
:VideoGame,
:VideoGameSeries,
:VideoObject ;
- :rangeIncludes :Person ;
- rdfs:comment "An actor, e.g. in TV, radio, movie, video games etc., or in an event. Actors can be associated with individual items or with a series, episode, clip." .
+ :rangeIncludes :Person,
+ :PerformingGroup ;
No worries :)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3352 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABJSGJSQMIN2PEMG75ZRHLYCPIC5AVCNFSM6AAAAAA22XBNRCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMYTOMJQHA2DQMBUGE>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
I believe there has been no actionable pushback on the change to allow PerformingGroup as an actor, so good to go? I suppose we could update the description a little. |
As discussed in #3185 cast information can contain groups (comedy, musical, etc.) as well as individual people.