Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement/cldsrv 431 misc api imp deny #5337

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: improvement/CLDSRV-429-get-api-impDeny
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KazToozs
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request template

Description

Motivation and context

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?

Related issues

Please use the following link syntaxes #600 to reference issues in the
current repository

Checklist

Add tests to cover the changes

New tests added or existing tests modified to cover all changes

Code conforms with the style guide

Sign your work

In order to contribute to the project, you must sign your work
https://github.com/scality/Guidelines/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work

Thank you again for contributing! We will try to test and integrate the change
as soon as we can.

@KazToozs KazToozs force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-431-misc-api-impDeny branch from 66186b3 to 9e46a89 Compare September 13, 2023 16:53
@KazToozs KazToozs force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-431-misc-api-impDeny branch from 49d80c6 to 9bf9130 Compare September 18, 2023 16:41
@KazToozs KazToozs force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-429-get-api-impDeny branch from 58e1b92 to 482e657 Compare September 19, 2023 09:02
The code in this commit causes an error in the 'implicit deny iam policy with "Allow" bucket policy for User ARN' test for PutObject, giving an AccessDenied because the implicitDent is true. It seems worth re-evaluating the ACL expectations at this point.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant