Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we exclude CellTalkDB from curated resources list? #75

Open
dbdimitrov opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Should we exclude CellTalkDB from curated resources list? #75

dbdimitrov opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@dbdimitrov
Copy link
Collaborator

dbdimitrov commented Nov 28, 2023

@deeenes I keep finding strange interactions that occur as PPIs but not actual CCC and are reported as such in CellTalkDB - e.g. SORBS1-INSR or interactions with SMAD3. Might be best if we exclude CellTalkDB from the curated resources list in OmniPath, and hence LIANA.

@dbdimitrov dbdimitrov added bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Nov 28, 2023
@dbdimitrov dbdimitrov self-assigned this Nov 28, 2023
@dbdimitrov dbdimitrov added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Nov 28, 2023
@dbdimitrov dbdimitrov changed the title Remove CellTalkDB from curated resources list Should we exclude CellTalkDB from curated resources list Nov 28, 2023
@dbdimitrov dbdimitrov changed the title Should we exclude CellTalkDB from curated resources list Should we exclude CellTalkDB from curated resources list? Nov 28, 2023
@dbdimitrov dbdimitrov added the question Further information is requested label Nov 28, 2023
@dbdimitrov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dbdimitrov commented Nov 28, 2023

PS. It seems to me that the authors of the resource, took some resources (specifically LRdb as they have a huge overlap and this one is not curated) at face value and then curated them i.e. found the literature support for the interaction, but did not necessarily check if it occurs in the context of CCC.

@dbdimitrov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dbdimitrov commented Nov 29, 2023

At the very least we should exclude the interactions the reference of which points to LRdb/SingleCellSignalR and Ramilowski as these are not curated, simply transferred.

@dnjst
Copy link

dnjst commented Jan 2, 2024

I can give some feedback as a user on the interaction lists.

The old liana consensus was coming up with a lot of spurious interactions like cofactors as receptors. Manually cutting down to only interactions from CellPhoneDB v4 | CellChat | Connectome got rid of those.

Then, with release of the new CellPhoneDB v5 (manually curated), it seems to be high quality and incorporates almost all of the "good" interactions from other manual resources. It also has useful metadata. Since it is under active development (unlike others which publish and then static), I have had good results with using that as the baseline, and don't bother trying to get more interactions (or if I find more in the literature, submit to CPDB).

@dbdimitrov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dbdimitrov commented Jan 2, 2024

Thanks @dnjst, this is helpful to hear.

We will soon make the latest version of CPDB5 available via liana (and will be updated on each version). So, that it's also versioned and easily accessible.
Though, I would also consider setting CPDBv5 as default (under the assumption that while it might be missing interactions which might be of interest, those in it reliable). Or at the very least, I will rely more on CPDB when I rebuild the consensus.

Daniel

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants