WiP: Add support for wolfSSL for TLS. #4668
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thx for the effort! I am definitely interested. However, @alorbach maintains the openSSL component. Andre, what do you think? Any concerns? |
|
one thing I would say (without examining the code and library here) is that an
ongoing problem ith TLS is getting info on what's going wrong with connections
for debugging. While we are interested, if you can provide debugging examples in
your documentation, you may be able to become the recommended default rather
quickly :-)
you can search the mailing list for MANY threads about TLS problems.
David Lang
|
|
Hi @rgerhards and @alorbach, just circling back on this to see if you are still interested in having wolfSSL support upstream. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello @rgerhards. I'm a software engineer with wolfSSL, and we recently had a customer ask us to port rsyslog from OpenSSL to wolfSSL. wolfSSL provides an OpenSSL compatibility layer that implements the majority of the OpenSSL API. As such, I was able to integrate wolfSSL support into the existing OpenSSL code in rsyslog. I'm curious if you would be interested in upstreaming this work, and if so, I'm also interested in any feedback you have on the patch. Thanks!