Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixing requirements #518

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

padhupradheep
Copy link
Member

okay my try to fix the requirements and conflicts..

#364

@padhupradheep
Copy link
Member Author

padhupradheep commented Feb 6, 2024

#465 (comment)

I have read the comments from Alexey here. However, I cannot do such comparison since with the default setup on the main, I wasn't able to successfully neither install nor build the packages.

@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Member

SteveMacenski commented Feb 6, 2024

It appears to break the collapsing section in the build and install guide (https://output.circle-artifacts.com/output/job/b20b2946-bd6e-485a-91ee-3b16dd2ab84e/artifacts/0/html/development_guides/build_docs/index.html) Here live: https://navigation.ros.org/development_guides/build_docs/index.html that you can compare it to.

I suspect there are more breakages. This is why we have statically set versions to make sure new versions don't come about and break things without our note. I don't mind updating, but those updates still need to be statically set and tested to make sure there aren't any regressions (like what I mention above) or the website is updated appropriately to work around those issues.

I understand that these are way out of date, but you should still be able to install them by setting the version number (that's what I do). With that said, I definitely won't argue with someone updating them :-) However, it needs (1) new static versions to use -- even just the current set and (2) testing by looking through the pages carefully and finding these kinds of errors and resolving them

@padhupradheep
Copy link
Member Author

Oh right, I forgot about the artifacts.

Could we leave this PR open? I'd try to revisit and figure out a static version for each of the dependencies when I get some time.

@padhupradheep padhupradheep marked this pull request as draft February 6, 2024 17:22
@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Member

OK! That should be easy though looking at the dependency install stage - does that not simply tell you what version it installed (and you could just use that)? That seems like the EZ-PZ way of doing it. If the only issue is the collapsing section, I'd be OK with just removing those as collapsing sections or having you take a look to see what else we could do to organize those long pages through another mechanism if that one can't get fixed.

I think Alexey also tried to upgrade to 22.04 instead of 20.04, which seems wise at the same time. He highlighted some of his integration changes -- though if you could tell me the difference between a few of those except Kerning (which is fine to change between versions), that would be news to me 😆

So, you may be able to do even more updates to keep in line to make easier

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants