Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(compaction): optimize for large number of small files #16585

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Little-Wallace
Copy link
Contributor

@Little-Wallace Little-Wallace commented May 6, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

Signed-off-by: Little-Wallace <bupt2013211450@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Little-Wallace <bupt2013211450@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Little-Wallace <bupt2013211450@gmail.com>
@Little-Wallace
Copy link
Contributor Author

this branch:
image

main branch:
image

compaction_config.target_file_size_base / 4
let target_file_size = if input.target_level == 0 || input.target_level == base_level {
let task_size = input.target_input_size + input.select_input_size;
if input.target_level > 0 && task_size < compaction_config.max_bytes_for_level_base {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, It is sporadic that task size is smaller than max_bytes_for_level_base. So the original behavior is changed here.

my suggestion is

  1. It is necessary to test daily nexmark and compare the performance.

  2. Cover through UT to ensure that the output meets expectations

  3. Trigger the branch through the special test mentioned in the PR.

Signed-off-by: Little-Wallace <bupt2013211450@gmail.com>
@Little-Wallace
Copy link
Contributor Author

Little-Wallace commented May 10, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants