Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft: feat merge domain attributes #981

Conversation

MyPyDavid
Copy link
Member

@MyPyDavid MyPyDavid commented Apr 24, 2024

Description

When there many "duplicates" of Attributes in an instance, it would be helpful to perform a merge of certain attributes to clean up those duplicate Attributes.

Related issue: #ISSUE_NUMBER

Motivation and Context

How has this been tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of Changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe):

Checklist

  • I have read the contributor guide.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@MyPyDavid MyPyDavid force-pushed the feat-merge-domain-attributes branch 2 times, most recently from 5734524 to a541f12 Compare May 13, 2024 15:42
Signed-off-by: David Wallace <david.wallace@tu-darmstadt.de>
@MyPyDavid MyPyDavid force-pushed the feat-merge-domain-attributes branch from a541f12 to 21771c2 Compare May 14, 2024 07:31
@MyPyDavid MyPyDavid closed this May 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant