Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RavenDB-22247 ExpiredDocumentsCleaner is lacking the usage of ForgetAbout (6.0) #18500

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

poissoncorp
Copy link
Contributor

Issue link

https://issues.hibernatingrhinos.com/issue/RavenDB-22247/ExpiredDocumentsCleaner-is-lacking-the-usage-of-ForgetAbout

Additional description

Added ForgetAbout call, only on docs that are already scheduled to expire/refresh.
PR for 5.4 - #18499

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Regression bug fix
  • Optimization
  • New feature

How risky is the change?

  • Low
  • Moderate
  • High
  • Not relevant

Backward compatibility

  • Non breaking change
  • Ensured. Please explain how has it been implemented?
  • Breaking change
  • Not relevant

Is it platform specific issue?

  • Yes. Please list the affected platforms.
  • No

Documentation update

  • This change requires a documentation update. Please mark the issue on YouTrack using Documentation Required tag.
  • No documentation update is needed

Testing by Contributor

  • Tests have been added that prove the fix is effective or that the feature works
  • Internal classes added to the test class (e.g. entity or index definition classes) have the lowest possible access modifier (preferable private)
  • It has been verified by manual testing

Testing by RavenDB QA team

  • This change requires a special QA testing due to possible performance or resources usage implications (CPU, memory, IO). Please mark the issue on YouTrack using QA Required tag.
  • No special testing by RavenDB QA team is needed

Is there any existing behavior change of other features due to this change?

  • Yes. Please list the affected features/subsystems and provide appropriate explanation
  • No

UI work

  • It requires further work in the Studio. Please mark the issue on YouTrack using Studio Required tag.
  • No UI work is needed

@arekpalinski arekpalinski merged commit 7bac0b1 into ravendb:v6.0 May 15, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@arekpalinski arekpalinski mentioned this pull request May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants