Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improved support for frames and shadow DOMs / shadow roots #3569

Open
3 tasks
The-Compiler opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #7617
Open
3 tasks

Improved support for frames and shadow DOMs / shadow roots #3569

The-Compiler opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #7617
Labels
component: QtWebEngine Issues related to the QtWebEngine backend, based on Chromium. language: javascript Issues which require knowing JavaScript. priority: 2 - low Issues which are currently not very important.

Comments

@The-Compiler
Copy link
Member

The-Compiler commented Feb 7, 2018 •
edited

Remaining issues with frame support after #3371:
@The-Compiler The-Compiler added the priority: 2 - low Issues which are currently not very important. label Feb 7, 2018
@qutebrowser-bot qutebrowser-bot added component: QtWebEngine Issues related to the QtWebEngine backend, based on Chromium. language: javascript Issues which require knowing JavaScript. labels Feb 7, 2018
This was referenced Feb 7, 2018
Closed
Merged
@jgkamat jgkamat mentioned this issue Mar 9, 2018
Open
@The-Compiler The-Compiler mentioned this issue May 2, 2018
Open
@The-Compiler The-Compiler mentioned this issue May 16, 2020
Closed
@qutebrowser qutebrowser deleted a comment from qutebrowser-bot May 16, 2020
@The-Compiler The-Compiler mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2020
Closed
@The-Compiler The-Compiler changed the title Improved support for frames Improved support for frames and shadow DOMs / shadow roots Apr 19, 2021
@The-Compiler
Copy link
Member Author

For so-called open shadow DOMs (explanation), it should actually be possible for qutebrowser to access the elements therein.

However, I'm a bit confused about what the best way would be - it looks like there used to be a /deep/ combinator (later renamed to >>>?), but that apparently was removed in the latest draft?

Also see whatwg/dom#665

This won't be possible with closed shadow DOMs though, see:

@The-Compiler The-Compiler mentioned this issue Apr 19, 2021
Closed
@The-Compiler The-Compiler mentioned this issue Sep 14, 2021
Closed
@joelkur joelkur linked a pull request Mar 13, 2023 that will close this issue
Open
@The-Compiler The-Compiler mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
component: QtWebEngine Issues related to the QtWebEngine backend, based on Chromium. language: javascript Issues which require knowing JavaScript. priority: 2 - low Issues which are currently not very important.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix hints not finding elements from shadow roots joelkur/qutebrowser
2 participants
@The-Compiler @qutebrowser-bot