Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ncm-network: nmstate change the way dummy interfaces are created. #1683

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 15, 2024

Conversation

aka7
Copy link
Contributor

@aka7 aka7 commented May 3, 2024

use key instead of index to label dummy interface. This will allow referencing the correct vip elsewhere in pan or external applications. Add tests.

  • Why the change is necessary.
    Allow creation of dummy interface in nmstate using labels instead of indexing.

  • What backwards incompatibility it may introduce.
    if using nmstate dummy interface, profile name will change from dummy0 to the label given to dumm interface, so if its myvip, it will change from dummy0 to dummy_myvip. I believe noone is using this currently. This was feature only added in nmstate.

@jrha jrha added this to the 24.3 milestone May 3, 2024
jrha
jrha previously approved these changes May 3, 2024
@ned21
Copy link
Contributor

ned21 commented May 5, 2024

@jrha @aka7 - is the plan to squash these fixup commits and remove the merge commit from the branch before merging to keep the history easy-to-read-linear?

use key instead of index to label dummy interface. This will allow
referencing the correct vip elsewhere in pan or external applications.
Add tests.
@aka7 aka7 force-pushed the ncm_network_nmstate_dummy_fix branch from a3780b5 to c6f5502 Compare May 7, 2024 14:07
@aka7
Copy link
Contributor Author

aka7 commented May 7, 2024

@jrha @aka7 - is the plan to squash these fixup commits and remove the merge commit from the branch before merging to keep the history easy-to-read-linear?

@ned21 I've rebased and fixed the merge conflicts.
thanks.

@jrha jrha merged commit 1a8f0f8 into quattor:master May 15, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants