Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Raise an ArgumentError unless a hook is called with a block #3377

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joshuay03
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Prerequisite: #3376

I don't see why hooks should be processed if a block is not given, and if it's being called that way it could be due to user error. This ensures an ArgumentError is raised unless a block is given when configuring hooks.

Your checklist for this pull request

  • I have reviewed the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
  • I have added (or updated) appropriate tests if this PR fixes a bug or adds a feature.
  • My pull request is 100 lines added/removed or less so that it can be easily reviewed.
  • If this PR doesn't need tests (docs change), I added [ci skip] to the title of the PR.
  • If this closes any issues, I have added "Closes #issue" to the PR description or my commit messages.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All new and existing tests passed, including Rubocop.

@joshuay03 joshuay03 changed the title Update DSL hook processing logic to be consistent Raise an ArgumentError unless a hook is called with a block May 2, 2024
@joshuay03 joshuay03 marked this pull request as draft May 2, 2024 11:54
@dentarg
Copy link
Member

dentarg commented May 14, 2024

Should this be considered a breaking change and introduced with Puma 7?

@joshuay03
Copy link
Contributor Author

joshuay03 commented May 15, 2024

Should this be considered a breaking change and introduced with Puma 7?

That makes sense to me 👍🏽 I think #3376 is fine to release before that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants