Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency com.jcabi:jcabi-xml to v0.29.0 #59

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 19, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
com.jcabi:jcabi-xml (source) 0.27.2 -> 0.29.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jcabi/jcabi-xml (com.jcabi:jcabi-xml)

v0.29.0: feat(#​215): Add several useful constructors for SaxonDocument

Compare Source

See #​216, release log:

Released by Rultor 1.75.1, see build log

v0.28.0: XMLDocumentTest.java:59-64: Implement XPath 2.0...

Compare Source

See #​213, release log:

Released by Rultor 1.75.1, see build log


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency com.jcabi:jcabi-xml to v0.28.0 Update dependency com.jcabi:jcabi-xml to v0.29.0 Jul 21, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/com.jcabi-jcabi-xml-0.x branch from 9d2557f to fcadafa Compare July 21, 2023 11:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants