Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move dictEntry to PM #135

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 6.0-memkind
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

karpiop
Copy link
Collaborator

@karpiop karpiop commented Feb 11, 2020

dictEntry instances will be allocated to PM. Involves only main dictionary entries.


This change is Reviewable

Copy link

@michalbiesek michalbiesek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 7 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @karpiop)


src/dict.h, line 156 at r1 (raw file):

dictEntry *dictAddRawPM(dict *d, void *key, dictEntry **existing);

not used anywhere remove

Copy link

@KFilipek KFilipek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r1.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 10 unresolved discussions (waiting on @karpiop)


src/db.c, line 180 at r1 (raw file):

 * The program is aborted if the key already exists. */
void dbAdd(redisDb *db, robj *key, robj *val) {
    sds copy;

= NULL;


src/db.c, line 185 at r1 (raw file):

    else
        copy = sdsdup(key->ptr);
    int retval;

int retval = 0;
Please don't leave uninitialized values


src/dict.h, line 155 at r1 (raw file):

int dictAdd(dict *d, void *key, void *val);
int dictAddPM(dict *d, void *key, void *val);
dictEntry *dictAddRaw(dict *d, void *key, dictEntry **existing, int dictionary_entries_on_pmem);

camelCase, same as dictCreate


src/dict.h, line 157 at r1 (raw file):

dictEntry *dictAddRaw(dict *d, void *key, dictEntry **existing, int dictionary_entries_on_pmem);
dictEntry *dictAddRawPM(dict *d, void *key, dictEntry **existing);
dictEntry *dictAddOrFind(dict *d, void *key, int dictionary_entries_on_pmem);

camelCase, same as dictCreate


src/dict.c, line 292 at r1 (raw file):

 * If key was added, the hash entry is returned to be manipulated by the caller.
 */
dictEntry *dictAddRaw(dict *d, void *key, dictEntry **existing, int dictionary_entries_on_pmem)

camelCase, same as dictCreate


src/dict.c, line 292 at r1 (raw file):

 * If key was added, the hash entry is returned to be manipulated by the caller.
 */
dictEntry *dictAddRaw(dict *d, void *key, dictEntry **existing, int dictionary_entries_on_pmem)

Maybe const int* to avoid copy creation


src/dict.c, line 381 at r1 (raw file):

 *
 * See dictAddRaw() for more information. */
dictEntry *dictAddOrFind(dict *d, void *key, int dictionary_entries_on_pmem) {

camelCase, same as dictCreate


src/dict.c, line 383 at r1 (raw file):

dictEntry *dictAddOrFind(dict *d, void *key, int dictionary_entries_on_pmem) {
    dictEntry *entry, *existing;
    entry = dictAddRaw(d,key,&existing,dictionary_entries_on_pmem);

camelCase, same as dictCreate


src/expire.c, line 442 at r1 (raw file):

    if (db->id > 63) return;

    dictEntry *de = dictAddOrFind(slaveKeysWithExpire,key->ptr,server.dictionary_entries_on_pmem);

variables above have also camelcase naming

@karpiop karpiop force-pushed the dictEntry_on_pmem branch 2 times, most recently from 7a35632 to a4271ce Compare February 11, 2020 15:13
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@karpiop karpiop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 4 of 7 files reviewed, 10 unresolved discussions (waiting on @karpiop, @KFilipek, and @michalbiesek)


src/db.c, line 180 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, KFilipek (Krzysztof Filipek) wrote…

= NULL;

Done.


src/db.c, line 185 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, KFilipek (Krzysztof Filipek) wrote…

int retval = 0;
Please don't leave uninitialized values

Done.


src/dict.h, line 155 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, KFilipek (Krzysztof Filipek) wrote…

camelCase, same as dictCreate

Done.


src/dict.h, line 156 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, michalbiesek wrote…
dictEntry *dictAddRawPM(dict *d, void *key, dictEntry **existing);

not used anywhere remove

Done.


src/dict.h, line 157 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, KFilipek (Krzysztof Filipek) wrote…

camelCase, same as dictCreate

Done.


src/dict.c, line 292 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, KFilipek (Krzysztof Filipek) wrote…

camelCase, same as dictCreate

Done.


src/dict.c, line 381 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, KFilipek (Krzysztof Filipek) wrote…

camelCase, same as dictCreate

Done.


src/dict.c, line 383 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, KFilipek (Krzysztof Filipek) wrote…

camelCase, same as dictCreate

Done.

Copy link

@michalbiesek michalbiesek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 4 of 7 files reviewed, 12 unresolved discussions (waiting on @karpiop and @KFilipek)


src/dict.c, line 334 at r2 (raw file):

Quoted 10 lines of code…
int dictAddPM(dict *d, void *key, void *val)
{
    (void)(d);
    (void)(key);
    (void)(val);
    printf("ERROR: dictAddPM is supported only by memkind\n");
    exit(1);
     /* unreachable */
    return NULL;
}

not needed now - remove
this applies also to USE_MEMKIND


src/dict.c, line 345 at r2 (raw file):

}
#endif

As we spoke offline extend commit message to be more informative - maybe what scenario are covered


src/t_zset.c, line 2335 at r2 (raw file):

0

Maybe some define(s) for '0' and '1' value ? - I am not sure what header would be good to place it, but I guess you could figure it out.

@karpiop karpiop force-pushed the dictEntry_on_pmem branch 2 times, most recently from a52e170 to 25f80f9 Compare February 11, 2020 15:56
Copy link

@michalbiesek michalbiesek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 1 of 7 files reviewed, 10 unresolved discussions (waiting on @karpiop and @KFilipek)


src/db.c, line 185 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, karpiop (Paweł Karpiński) wrote…

Done.

IMHO this could be completely avoided using ternary operator:

int retval = (server.dictionary_entries_on_pmem) ?
dictAddPM(db->dict, copy, val) : dictAdd(db->dict, copy, val);

sds copy = (server.keys_on_pmem) ?
sdsdupPM(key->ptr) : sdsdup(key->ptr);

Copy link

@KFilipek KFilipek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 1 of 3 files at r2, 5 of 5 files at r4.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @karpiop)

dictEntry instances will be allocated to PM. Involves dictionary entries created using DB API (db.c)
PatKamin added a commit to PatKamin/redis that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2022
[4.0.11-devel] Add compile and linking security flags
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants