Skip to content

pacharanero/csus

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 

Repository files navigation

Clinical Software Usability Scale (cSUS)

Methodology

  • Following the pattern established by the scoring of the established, pan-industry, Systems Usability Scale (SUS) 8, the questions are scored against a 5-point scale:

Agree Strongly - Agree - Don’t Know - Disagree - Disagree Strongly

  • The ‘axis’ of the questions is alternated in order to try to vary the ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ attitude that the question could be seen to have.

  • The questions were created by the members of the CCIO and CIO Networks, during a plenary session at DHI CCIO Summer School 2015, and in ensuing discussions on this thread.

The Clinical Software Usability Survey questions are:

  1. In my opinion, the software reduces the risk of clinical error. (positive)

  2. Effective support for this software is hard to access in a clinically-appropriate timescale. (negative)

  3. In my opinion, the software improves the quality of clinical care I can provide. (positive)

  4. The quality of the interaction/consultation with the patient is adversely affected by the use of this software. (negative)

  5. Using the software gives me the key information I need on patient’s history, diagnosed conditions and current care and treatment plan. (positive)

Notes

  • Each question scores from 0 to 4 points, where 0 signifies a trait of the least usable system and 4 signifies a trait of the most usable system. Clearly, because the ‘axis’ of the questions is alternated, the mathematics of the scoring must be alternated too. It makes the scoring a little bit complicated, again this is how it’s done is the SUS so we followed suit.

  • The points are summed to give a total for the cSUS score in which the minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 20. They are then multiplied by a factor of 2.5 to give a score ranging from 0 to 50. The authors of SUS felt it necessary to include this multiplication step, which I believe is an unnecessary complication (and in fact, for those authors, resulted in completely avoidable confusion as to whether the SUS is a percentage 8), but we followed them in doing so in order to maintain compatibility/parity of weighting between SUS and cSUS.

  • In total therefore we end up with a SUS score out of 100 and a cSUS score out of 50. The total score for the combined survey is 150.

  • If you have any feedback or ways to improve the questions or methodology, then this would be a good place to discuss it. If making a suggestion to improve on of the questions, please supply a suggested alternative form of words, rather than just making a comment about the existing form of words.

Links

LICENSE

Creative Commons Licence
Clinical Software Usability Scale (cSUS) by Dr Marcus Baw is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

About

Clinical Software Usability Scale

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published