PoC support for java records (JEP 395) #1661
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
CLA Assistant Lite bot: Thank you for your submission! Before we can accept your contribution, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement. To sign the CLA, post a comment on this Pull Request that matches the following text exactly: I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request |
wcurrie
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Could be cool to support
recordfor java (was added in java 17 https://openjdk.org/jeps/395).I believe you could still target compile targeting java 1.8 (or whatever pre-record syntax version of java).