Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] OSDOCS-9437: adds custom audit log policies MicroShift #75233

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz commented Apr 26, 2024

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-9437

Link to docs preview:
Customizing audit logs

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 26, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 26, 2024

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-9437 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-9437

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 26, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 26, 2024

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-9437 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-9437

Link to docs preview:
Customizing audit logs

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz changed the title OSDOCS-9437: adds custom audit log policies MicroShift [WIP] OSDOCS-9437: adds custom audit log policies MicroShift Apr 26, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 26, 2024
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added this to the Planned for 4.16 GA milestone May 10, 2024
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz force-pushed the OSDOCS-9437 branch 3 times, most recently from 5774462 to a1928d8 Compare May 10, 2024 17:13
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 10, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 10, 2024

@ShaunaDiaz: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.16 do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants