Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs #74766

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2024

Conversation

Dhruv-Soni11
Copy link
Contributor

@Dhruv-Soni11 Dhruv-Soni11 commented Apr 17, 2024

Version(s): GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview: I have made the changes in a lot of places in the content. So, I am just adding a sample link for the changes at one instance: https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/observability/monitoring/monitoring-argo-cd-instances.html

SME review: @reginapizza
QE review: @varshab1210
Internal Peer review: @eromanova97
Peer review:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: This PR also includes the changes in content for correct policy for user level permissions from the following PR. Further details for this issue are available in the following: #69134

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 17, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 17, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 17, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 17, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview:

SME review:
QE review:
Internal Peer review:
Peer review:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Apr 17, 2024

🤖 Thu May 09 11:28:01 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 17, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview:

I have made the changes in a lot of places in the content. So, I am just adding a sample link for the changes at one instance:

https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/observability/monitoring/monitoring-argo-cd-instances.html

SME review: @reginapizza
QE review: @varshab1210
Internal Peer review: @eromanova97
Peer review:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 23, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview:

I have made the changes in a lot of places in the content. So, I am just adding a sample link for the changes at one instance:

https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/observability/monitoring/monitoring-argo-cd-instances.html

SME review: @reginapizza
QE review: @varshab1210
Internal Peer review: @eromanova97
Peer review:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

This PR also includes the changes in content for correct policy for user level permissions from the following PR. Further details for this issue are available in the following: #69134

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview: I have made the changes in a lot of places in the content. So, I am just adding a sample link for the changes at one instance: https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/observability/monitoring/monitoring-argo-cd-instances.html

SME review: @reginapizza
QE review: @varshab1210
Internal Peer review: @eromanova97
Peer review:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: This PR also includes the changes in content for correct policy for user level permissions from the following PR. Further details for this issue are available in the following: #69134

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview: I have made the changes in a lot of places in the content. So, I am just adding a sample link for the changes at one instance: https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/observability/monitoring/monitoring-argo-cd-instances.html

SME review: @reginapizza
QE review: @varshab1210
Internal Peer review: @eromanova97
Peer review:

QE review: - [ ] QE has approved this change.

Additional information: This PR also includes the changes in content for correct policy for user level permissions from the following PR. Further details for this issue are available in the following: #69134

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview: I have made the changes in a lot of places in the content. So, I am just adding a sample link for the changes at one instance: https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/observability/monitoring/monitoring-argo-cd-instances.html

SME review: @reginapizza
QE review: @varshab1210
Internal Peer review: @eromanova97
Peer review:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: This PR also includes the changes in content for correct policy for user level permissions from the following PR. Further details for this issue are available in the following: #69134

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview: I have made the changes in a lot of places in the content. So, I am just adding a sample link for the changes at one instance: https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/observability/monitoring/monitoring-argo-cd-instances.html

SME review: @reginapizza
QE review: @varshab1210
Internal Peer review: @eromanova97
Peer review:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: This PR also includes the changes in content for correct policy for user level permissions from the following PR. Further details for this issue are available in the following: #69134

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-5954 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): GitOps 1.9, GitOps 1.10, GitOps 1.11, GitOps 1.12

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5954

Link to docs preview: I have made the changes in a lot of places in the content. So, I am just adding a sample link for the changes at one instance: https://74766--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/observability/monitoring/monitoring-argo-cd-instances.html

SME review: @reginapizza
QE review: @varshab1210
Internal Peer review: @eromanova97
Peer review:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: This PR also includes the changes in content for correct policy for user level permissions from the following PR. Further details for this issue are available in the following: #69134

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@eromanova97 eromanova97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

modules/gitops-storing-and-retrieving-argo-cd-logs.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 30, 2024
@Dhruv-Soni11
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @varshab1210 and @eromanova97 - I have included the fixes for all of your comments. PTAL.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 1, 2024
@Dhruv-Soni11
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label needs-peer-review

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 8, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: The label(s) /label needs-peer-review cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, peer-review-done, peer-review-in-progress, peer-review-needed, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label needs-peer-review

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Dhruv-Soni11
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 8, 2024
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label May 8, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels May 8, 2024
@Dhruv-Soni11
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @jeana-redhat - Thanks for providing the fixes. I have incorporated your feedback in the latest changes. PTAL. Thank you :)

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 9, 2024

@Dhruv-Soni11: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jeana-redhat - Thanks for providing the fixes. I have incorporated your feedback in the latest changes. PTAL. Thank you :)

LGTM, tag for merge review if you're ready to move it along :)

@Dhruv-Soni11
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label May 10, 2024
@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh added gitops merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels May 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM; merging to gitops 1.9+.

@sheriff-rh sheriff-rh merged commit 687275d into openshift:gitops-docs-main May 10, 2024
3 checks passed
@sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick gitops-docs-1.12

@sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick gitops-docs-1.11

@sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick gitops-docs-1.10

@sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick gitops-docs-1.9

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sheriff-rh: new pull request created: #75764

In response to this:

/cherrypick gitops-docs-1.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sheriff-rh: #74766 failed to apply on top of branch "gitops-docs-1.11":

Applying: RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/gitops-argo-cd-installation.adoc
M	modules/gitops-argo-cd-notification.adoc
A	modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc
M	modules/logging-in-to-the-argo-cd-instance-by-using-the-argo-cd-admin-account.adoc
A	modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc left in tree.
Auto-merging modules/logging-in-to-the-argo-cd-instance-by-using-the-argo-cd-admin-account.adoc
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc left in tree.
Auto-merging modules/gitops-argo-cd-notification.adoc
Auto-merging modules/gitops-argo-cd-installation.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherrypick gitops-docs-1.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sheriff-rh: #74766 failed to apply on top of branch "gitops-docs-1.10":

Applying: RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/gitops-argo-cd-installation.adoc
M	modules/gitops-argo-cd-notification.adoc
A	modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc
M	modules/logging-in-to-the-argo-cd-instance-by-using-the-argo-cd-admin-account.adoc
A	modules/moving-the-gitops-operator-pod-to-infrastructure-nodes.adoc
A	modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc left in tree.
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/moving-the-gitops-operator-pod-to-infrastructure-nodes.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/moving-the-gitops-operator-pod-to-infrastructure-nodes.adoc left in tree.
Auto-merging modules/logging-in-to-the-argo-cd-instance-by-using-the-argo-cd-admin-account.adoc
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc left in tree.
Auto-merging modules/gitops-argo-cd-notification.adoc
Auto-merging modules/gitops-argo-cd-installation.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/gitops-argo-cd-installation.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherrypick gitops-docs-1.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sheriff-rh: #74766 failed to apply on top of branch "gitops-docs-1.9":

Applying: RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
A	modules/gitops-argo-cd-dynamic-scaling-by-using-cli.adoc
A	modules/gitops-argo-cd-dynamic-scaling-in-web-console.adoc
M	modules/gitops-argo-cd-installation.adoc
M	modules/gitops-argo-cd-notification.adoc
M	modules/gitops-creating-rolloutmanager-custom-resource.adoc
A	modules/gitops-enabling-the-round-robin-sharding-algorithm-in-web-console.adoc
A	modules/gitops-enabling-the-round-robin-sharding-algorithm-using-cli.adoc
A	modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc
M	modules/logging-in-to-the-argo-cd-instance-by-using-the-argo-cd-admin-account.adoc
A	modules/moving-the-gitops-operator-pod-to-infrastructure-nodes.adoc
A	modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/proc_configuring-by-using-the-ocp-web-console.adoc left in tree.
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/moving-the-gitops-operator-pod-to-infrastructure-nodes.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/moving-the-gitops-operator-pod-to-infrastructure-nodes.adoc left in tree.
Auto-merging modules/logging-in-to-the-argo-cd-instance-by-using-the-argo-cd-admin-account.adoc
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/gitops-release-notes-1-12-0.adoc left in tree.
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/gitops-enabling-the-round-robin-sharding-algorithm-using-cli.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/gitops-enabling-the-round-robin-sharding-algorithm-using-cli.adoc left in tree.
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/gitops-enabling-the-round-robin-sharding-algorithm-in-web-console.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/gitops-enabling-the-round-robin-sharding-algorithm-in-web-console.adoc left in tree.
Auto-merging modules/gitops-creating-rolloutmanager-custom-resource.adoc
Auto-merging modules/gitops-argo-cd-notification.adoc
Auto-merging modules/gitops-argo-cd-installation.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/gitops-argo-cd-installation.adoc
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/gitops-argo-cd-dynamic-scaling-in-web-console.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/gitops-argo-cd-dynamic-scaling-in-web-console.adoc left in tree.
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/gitops-argo-cd-dynamic-scaling-by-using-cli.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs. Version RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs of modules/gitops-argo-cd-dynamic-scaling-by-using-cli.adoc left in tree.
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 RHDEVDOCS-5954: Fixing typos in pre-reqs
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherrypick gitops-docs-1.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sheriff-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@Dhruv-Soni11 looks like cherrypicks failed from 1.9-1.11, please resolve manual cherry picks and place them back in the merge queue, referencing this PR in the description. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
gitops jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants