Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.15] OCPBUGS-28928: Add UnservableInFutureVersions route status condition type #1751

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.15
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gcs278
Copy link
Contributor

@gcs278 gcs278 commented Feb 2, 2024

Cherry-Pick of #1722

Add UnservableInFutureVersions as a route status condition type. This change allows the router to indicate that a route is using an unsupported configuration and will be unservable in the future. The ingress operator may use this condition to block upgrades.

…type

Add UnservableInFutureVersions as a route status condition type. This
change allows the router to indicate that a route is using an
unsupported configuration and will be unservable in the future. The
ingress operator may use this condition to block upgrades.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 2, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26498, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.15." or "openshift-4.15.", but it targets "4.16.0" instead
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26498 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.16.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Cherry-Pick of #1722

Add UnservableInFutureVersions as a route status condition type. This change allows the router to indicate that a route is using an unsupported configuration and will be unservable in the future. The ingress operator may use this condition to block upgrades.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gcs278 gcs278 changed the title OCPBUGS-26498: Add UnservableInFutureVersions route status condition type [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-28928: Add UnservableInFutureVersions route status condition type Feb 2, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28928, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26498 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Cherry-Pick of #1722

Add UnservableInFutureVersions as a route status condition type. This change allows the router to indicate that a route is using an unsupported configuration and will be unservable in the future. The ingress operator may use this condition to block upgrades.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Hello @gcs278! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 2, 2024
@deads2k deads2k added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Feb 2, 2024
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Feb 2, 2024

/lgtm
/approve

@deads2k deads2k added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Feb 2, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, gcs278

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2024

@gcs278: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 3, 2024
@gcs278
Copy link
Contributor Author

gcs278 commented May 6, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-28928, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-26498 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants