New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-25821: add MCO management of api-int CA #1718
Conversation
Hello @cdoern! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
@cdoern: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25821, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cdoern The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira refresh |
@cdoern: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25821, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
@cdoern: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25821, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@cdoern: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/close We're going to close this and not do this management with an API process for now so its no longer attached to the bug. We'll revisit in newer versions |
@yuqi-zhang: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@cdoern: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-25821. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
the MCO needs to add some support for long living certs (10 years) that get populated in /etc/kubernetes/kubeconfig. These certs come from the openshift-config-managed/kube-apiserver-server-ca configmap and currently are only applied on bootstrap. So, if a cluster rotates often or exists for a long period of time, a user will eventually run into the "certificate signed by unknown authority" error when these certs expire.
What I did here is
KubeAPIServerClientCA
to represent what was previously being stored inKubeAPIServerServingCAData
. We were storing the client-ca data in the serverca entity.KubeAPIServerServingCAData
store the data for the api-int CA