Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No Release Tag Pushed since 4.1.0 #587

Open
rohanKanojia opened this issue Feb 11, 2020 · 10 comments
Open

No Release Tag Pushed since 4.1.0 #587

rohanKanojia opened this issue Feb 11, 2020 · 10 comments
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@rohanKanojia
Copy link

rohanKanojia commented Feb 11, 2020

Hi guys,

I'm from @fabric8io team. We maintain Kubernetes and Openshift Client which is used by a lot of people in the java ecosystem. We generate Kubernetes/Openshift model from go structs in api and origin. Right now our Openshift go struct model is pointing at v4.1.0[0], but I have noticed that no other tag has been pushed since then. Even Openshift 4.3.0 got released recently.

I'm just curious why Openshift upstream maintainers are not pushing tags. It's not like we're blocked as we can update model to latest master revision. But it would be nice if we upgrade with respect to
Openshift releases.

[0] https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client#compatibility-matrix

@rohanKanojia
Copy link
Author

@deads2k @smarterclayton @bparees @soltysh : polite ping, Would appreciate it if you could share your thoughts on this.

@soltysh
Copy link
Member

soltysh commented Mar 10, 2020

It's still in-progress, there are several dependencies we need to handle before we'll be able to publish those.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 2, 2020
@marun
Copy link
Contributor

marun commented Oct 21, 2020

So long as this repo remains untagged, the workaround can be go get with the desired branch name (e.g. master, release-x.x) and go.mod will pin to the SHA of the branch head.

@rohanKanojia
Copy link
Author

Yeah, we're managing with that till now. But we can't provide accurate compatibility matrices with respect to openshift versions

https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client#compatibility-matrix

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 20, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kaovilai
Copy link
Member

How long does this repo plan to remain untagged?
/reopen
/lifecycle frozen

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot reopened this May 19, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 19, 2023

@kaovilai: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

How long does this repo plan to remain untagged?
/reopen
/lifecycle frozen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. labels May 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants