Working version of the websocket support #3514
Conversation
|
It still has debugging statement that I will remove once it works well. |
|
I'm having problems in deciding what the lifetime of the ws object should be. I suspect that it isn't right at the moment. It deserves more thought. |
|
Any further thoughts on the |
pjsg
changed the title
|
After more thought, I've fixed the lifetime problems. Also I got rid of a memory leak. This is good to go. |
docs/modules/httpd.md
Outdated
| httpd.start({ | ||
| webroot = "<static file prefix>", | ||
| max_handlers = 20, | ||
| auto_index = httpd.INDEX_NONE + httpd.INDEX_ROOT + httpd.INDEX_ALL, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you want || rather than + here; they're meant to be a choice, not bits to be set together :)
|
This turned out to be more effort than I'd expected, so I'm glad you tackled it instead of me :D I haven't tried it out or done an in-depth code review, but if you reckon it's ready to go, I'm happy to go with that. I left one comment about the docs that you might want to check before merging, but other than that, it'd be good to get this functionality in! |
| @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ configured. | |||
| httpd.start({ | |||
| webroot = "<static file prefix>", | |||
| max_handlers = 20, | |||
| auto_index = httpd.INDEX_NONE || httpd.INDEX_ROOT || httpd.INDEX_ALL, | |||
| auto_index = httpd.INDEX_ALL, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This removes the mention of the other index modes, I can't say I'm in favour of that 🙃
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It turns out that these are actually enums and shouldn't be or'ed together. Worse, the example uses || which is the logical or. Thus, this expression returns the first non-zero value!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, logical OR, because you need to choose one of them. What's the correct syntax for that in this case, if not that? (genuine question, not a snarky comment)
Fixes #<GITHUB_ISSUE_NUMBER>.
devbranch rather than for thereleasebranch.docs/*.This is the websocket enhancement to the httpd implementation. Unfortunately, it doesn't actually work due to a bug in the IDF, but there is a fix, and I'm hopeful that it will get merged soon. espressif/esp-idf#8596